![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||
In past traditional Jewish contexts, Jewish identity developed in an organic way through immersion in the rhythm of Jewish life as lived by Jewish families and communities. Familiarity with Jewish practices, calendar and lifecycle, as well as their meaning, stemmed from first-hand experience with Jewish living. Formal Jewish learning complemented the process of Jewish identity formation through family and community.
But during the last century in America, acculturation and assimilation changed the balance between family and formal education. For most Jews, the synagogue or community religious school, rather than the family and community, became the primary means of inculcating Jewish knowledge and identity. Limitations of the synagogue school as a surrogate for the Jewish family/neighborhood: The emergence and influence of Jewish family education: The current range of Jewish family education programming embraces parent learning programs paralleling children’s education but on an adult level; joint parent-child workshops or learning units; educational materials for home-based use by families; family educational events in the community; family-based curricula; intensive programming such as family camps and shabbatonim; and outstanding web-based family learning resources. The promise/limitations of Jewish family education: 1. Jewish children's education inculcates Jewish identity far more effectively when it occurs within and is reinforced by a family and communal context. Students find learning more meaningful and relevant when they witness their parent(s) and other adults similarly engaged in exploring their own Jewish identity through learning and practice, and when they observe what they are learning being practiced within a familial and communal context. 2. Children's education is often a significant gateway for Jewish parents to develop a deeper sense of connection as adults with Jewish practice, tradition, and community. The years of their child’s Jewish education represent the most promising “window of opportunity” to engage Jewish adults; this is when parents may be most open and have greatest access to Jewish resources and community. Too often, parents are not engaged in the process of Jewish growth, either for their children or for themselves, and they are involved only vicariously through their children’s learning. Once adults engage from a sense of parental responsibility, they often recognize their own personal motives for deepening their Jewish learning. 3. Jewish learning has the power to build community by binding people together in deepened relationships. Family-oriented Jewish education has the potential to significantly strengthen participants' sense of Jewish community and to revitalize and transform synagogues as institutions. The active involvement of parents in Jewish learning through family education programming holds important implications for the transformation of congregations generally. Setting family learning in a communal context can dramatically infuse congregations with new energy and build a deeper and more meaningful sense of Jewish community for participants. It can also generate significantly deeper engagement in Jewish communal life generally. The next frontier of Jewish family-based learning: synagogue transformation. |
||||
© 2007 Legacy Heritage Fund |
||||||